Categories: world

Why Judge John Roberts spoke against Donald Trump's comments to judges

When the episodes were stacked up, from Trump's campaign time in 2016 and to his presidency, the man sitting at…

When the episodes were stacked up, from Trump’s campaign time in 2016 and to his presidency, the man sitting at the federal judiciary said nothing.

Not to mention a duplicate three hours later from Trump on Twitter.

The amazing series of events – which showed a bold side of Roberts – showed how much Trump’s relationship with the third branch has devolved. The US judiciary has strived to be above the political fray that has only been exacerbated by Trump.

Robert’s response is especially true from Trump’s comments on Tuesday at the District Court judge Jon Tigar’s decision on Monday evening to temporarily block an executive order that would have scaled off US asylum policy. Trump criticized San Francisco-based Tigar, nominated 201

2, as an “Obama judge”. Trump declared “an automatic loss” for the administration of the regional US court that was to monitor any appeal cases, and “the 9th circuit is very unfair.”

A statement on Wednesday was published due to a question from The Associated Press, Roberts said: “We do not have Obama Judge or Trump Judge, Bush Judge or Clinton Judge. What we have is an additional group of dedicated judges who do their best to make the same right to those in front of them. The independent judiciary is something we should be grateful for. “

This was not the first time Roberts had been asked to comment, but it was the first The time he decided to become public. A representative of the Republican President George W. Bush in 2005, Roberts did not explain his time.

However, it may be due to the combination of Trump’s specific insult – depicting Tigar in a political empire based on the president who appointed him – as well as the latest acknowledgment of the new Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Roberts public concern for the federal justice system’s reputation comes as the highest court has been torn 5-4 in ideological and political directions. The latest retirement of swing vote Justice Anthony Kennedy has deepened the split, and Roberts has already signaled an attempt to reduce the divisions among the nine.

Highest justice spoke largely of legal independence in October after the turbulent Kavanaugh hearings. Roberts referred to an audience of the Minnesota audience “Washington’s controversial events in recent weeks” and then claimed the Supreme Court’s independence from the executive and legislative branches.

“I will not criticize the political branches,” he said. “We often do this in our opinions. But what I would like to do briefly emphasizes how the legal branch is – how it must be – very different.”

Robert’s statement on Wednesday was of a different order, stronger and consciously recalling the president’s own remark of an “Obama judge”.

The Court of Appeal has often expressed terror when judges are referred to politically. He has also observed since 2010, with the departure of Liberal Justice John Paul Stevens, a nominee for Republican President Gerald Ford, that it can be more difficult to persuade the public about justice’s impartiality from politics.

Since Stevens succeeded by Obama employee Elena Kagan and continuing with Trump’s election of Kavanaugh, the court’s five conservative justice were named by Republican presidents and the four liberals – often associated with the deviation – were named by democratic presidents.

With Kennedy’s retirement, Roberts is now ideological in the middle of court, and he may be inclined to secure his own conservative instincts to clean the bench and avoid more polarization.

When he considered whether he would answer Trump’s latest advance to court on Tuesday, Roberts was undoubtedly weighed how much he could provoke Trump. Roberts concluded that it was time to defend the judges’ special role in American democracy.

The 63-year-old boss was unlikely to be surprised that Trump fired in two consecutive tweets: “Unfortunately, Judge John Roberts, but you actually have” Obama Judges “and they have a very different point of view than the people who are responsible for the security of our country. It would be great if the 9th circuit really was an “independent court” but if it is … are so many opposite cases (on borders and security) cases posted there and why is one Many cases are reversed. Please check the numbers, they are shocking. We need protection and security – these judgments make our country unsafe! Very dangerous and unwise! “

Roberts offered no new retort. And given the opposition of the supreme justice to the appearance of politics, it is unlikely that he will not answer soon.

Published by