Categories: world

The Indonesian defendant suffers backlash in Kim's assassination attempt

Indonesian Siti Aisyah, center escorted by police, leaves Shah Alam High Court after a court hearing in Shah Alam, Malaysia on Tuesday, December 18, 2018. Siti and Vietnamese Doan Thi Huong, accused of murdering North Korea's leader's half-brother Kim Jong Nam, was back in Malaysia's court for a trial hearing. (AP Photo / Vincent Thian) SHAH ALAM, Malaysia – An Indonesian woman due to start her defense next month in her trial of the murder in Malaysia by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's half brother was hit by a worsening Tuesday when a referee rejected his bid for to secure statements given to the police by seven witnesses. Siti Aisyah's lawyer, Gooi Soon Seng, said he will appeal the Supreme Court's verdict that the statements were privileged. He said the statements were crucial because most witnesses were inaccessible. In August, a judge in the High Court found that there was sufficient evidence that Aisyah and her Vietnamese accomplice Doan Thi Huong, along with four missing North Korean suspects, had engaged in a "well-planned conspiracy" to kill Kim Jong Nam. The two young women are accused of smudging VX nerve agent on Kim's face at a Kuala Lumpur airport terminal on February 13, 2017. They said they thought they participated in a prank for a television show. They are the only suspicious guardians. The four North Korean suspects fled the land the same morning as Kim was killed. Aisyah would begin to tell on January 7th, but Gooi said there…

An Indonesian woman due to start her defense next month in her trial of the murder in Malaysia by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s half brother was hit by a worsening Tuesday when a referee rejected his bid for to secure statements given to the police by seven witnesses.

Siti Aisyah’s lawyer, Gooi Soon Seng, said he will appeal the Supreme Court’s verdict that the statements were privileged. He said the statements were crucial because most witnesses were inaccessible.

In August, a judge in the High Court found that there was sufficient evidence that Aisyah and her Vietnamese accomplice Doan Thi Huong, along with four missing North Korean suspects, had engaged in a “well-planned conspiracy” to kill Kim Jong Nam.

The two young women are accused of smudging VX nerve agent on Kim’s face at a Kuala Lumpur airport terminal on February 13, 2017. They said they thought they participated in a prank for a television show. They are the only suspicious guardians. The four North Korean suspects fled the land the same morning as Kim was killed.

Aisyah would begin to tell on January 7th, but Gooi said there will be a delay in anticipation of the appeal.

He said one of the witnesses who drove Kim to the airport had died. He said they managed to interview only two of the seven witnesses offered by prosecutors, while the others could not be contacted. Thus, what they had said was that the police helped to give a clearer picture of Kim’s death.

Throw the seeds that Tuesday’s verdict would “compromise our case”.

In his judgment, the judge agreed with the prosecutor’s office that the statements should not be published because there is a risk of manipulation with witnesses. The judge said, however, that prosecutors must ensure that the witnesses appear for the trial.

The court ruled no new test date.


Source link

Share
Published by
Faela