Earlier this week, the mysterious interstellar object Oumuamua was back in the headlines. It did not resume due to any…
Earlier this week, the mysterious interstellar object Oumuamua was back in the headlines. It did not resume due to any new observations or studies because it passed through our solar system back in late 2017, but rather because of a new paper that was not so subtle suggested, the item was actually of foreign origin.
Paper, written by researchers from Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, talks about the behavior of the object as it looped around the sun and zoomed back into space. It highlights the fact that the item seemed faster when it left, and argued with some vague suggestions that it might be a strange ship or even an exclusive space rubbish. Not everyone in the scientific community is willing to take the theory of nominal value.
Until this point, there was really nothing to suggest that the cigar-shaped object was the work of foreigners. It crucified through our system very quickly, and while researchers went back and forth if it was an asteroid or comet, there was no evidence to support an explanation with foreigners. The new paper does not change it, but it tries to explain how a spacecraft developer system called a light signal can be responsible for the object’s acceleration.
A light signal is like the boat’s sail, just in space. A lightsail would be attached to another object, and because of the impact of material flowing from a star, speed is built without using any fuel. Nobody has actually built or tested a lightsail yet, but it did not prevent the researchers from suggesting that it could be a credible explanation for the increased speed of Oumuamuas when it left the solar system.
This proposal and the consequences that an extraterrestrial civilization may have used the object to monitor our system or even study the earth close by has been drawn by many.
“What you need to understand is: Scientists are very happy to publish an outlandish idea if it has the least chance of not being wrong,” astrologer Katie Mack noted in a thread on Twitter . “Some of us are more conservative, of course. And it differs safely by field. But in my area (astrophysics / cosmology) there is generally no disadvantage to publish something that is (a) somehow interesting and (b) not completely ruled out , regardless of whether it ends “the correct answer.” “
She is not alone, and other researchers have weighed in with her own doubts about the theory. Simply put, there is no real smoke gun that screams “aliens!” But there is also not much to prove that it is not not . The result is a theory that sounds groundbreaking and unbelievable, but is almost certainly just a dream.