Categories: world

Mueller's open report compared to Comey's Clinton slam: “equally problematic”

The furious debate on special adviser Robert Mueller's Russia report has invited fresh comparisons with the case from the end of another politically charged case – Hillary Clinton's email probe. Now the Republicans are angry with Mueller's decision not to reach a conclusion on whether President Trump prevented justice – while still describing a host of harmful findings – similar to that of former FBI director James Comey's treatment of Trump's political nemesis. HUNDREDS OF EX-PROSECUTORS CLAIM TRUMP MUST HAVE ADOPTED FOR NO PRESIDENT [19659004] Back in 2016, Comey rogue went to hold a press conference that recommended against fees for Clinton's use of a personal server for official government department, while her political enemies got ammunition by calling their actions "extremely sloppy". The Mueller report, meanwhile, left the obstruction issue but contained almost 200 pages of material as Trumps The Mozambican critics clearly say he showed how he prevented investigations. In a floor speech earlier this week, later Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote the comparison between the two situations and called both "problematic". Notes the outgoing Deputy Advocate-General Rod Rosenstein authorized Mueller to prosecute federal crimes that occurred during the probe when "necessary and appropriate," Grassley said: "But that was not what the Special Adviser did on the obstruction issue. Instead, the Special Adviser refused to do a" traditional Prosecutor's decision. "" "It is not the prosecutor's job to" liberate "a subject. It is to charge a crime, or not to charge a crime," Grassley continued. "But in its report,…

The furious debate on special adviser Robert Mueller’s Russia report has invited fresh comparisons with the case from the end of another politically charged case – Hillary Clinton’s email probe.

Now the Republicans are angry with Mueller’s decision not to reach a conclusion on whether President Trump prevented justice – while still describing a host of harmful findings – similar to that of former FBI director James Comey’s treatment of Trump’s political nemesis.

HUNDREDS OF EX-PROSECUTORS CLAIM TRUMP MUST HAVE ADOPTED FOR NO PRESIDENT [19659004] Back in 2016, Comey rogue went to hold a press conference that recommended against fees for Clinton’s use of a personal server for official government department, while her political enemies got ammunition by calling their actions “extremely sloppy”. The Mueller report, meanwhile, left the obstruction issue but contained almost 200 pages of material as Trumps The Mozambican critics clearly say he showed how he prevented investigations.

In a floor speech earlier this week, later Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote the comparison between the two situations and called both “problematic”.

Notes the outgoing Deputy Advocate-General Rod Rosenstein authorized Mueller to prosecute federal crimes that occurred during the probe when “necessary and appropriate,” Grassley said: “But that was not what the Special Adviser did on the obstruction issue. Instead, the Special Adviser refused to do a” traditional Prosecutor’s decision. “”

“It is not the prosecutor’s job to” liberate “a subject. It is to charge a crime, or not to charge a crime,” Grassley continued. “But in its report, the special council’s decision explains that he does not make a decision.”

Grassley said Mueller’s move “reminds him of Comey’s charge decision.”

“Comey made a prosecution decision that wasn’t his doing,” Grassley said. “He also released derogatory information about Clinton’s secretary and then did not show all his work.”

He added: “The Special Council’s report is at least as problematic.”

Grassley explained that Volume II in Mueller’s report, which focuses on obstruction, lays out “investigative work product but leaves the fee decision hanging”.

Meanwhile, Trump has promoted similar comparisons, citing the previous Whitewater Independent Counsel Robert Ray via Twitter over the weekend.

Report sounded very much to Comeyesque, in other words, I will not charge this person (it was not even close to being a crime), but I will criticize him on the way out the door. It’s unfortunate because it goes beyond the role, “” Trump tweeted, paraphrasing Ray’s comments from an interview on Fox News.

And while the White House did not officially draw the same Mueller-Comey comparison, White House Emmet Flood last month presented a series of concerns with Mueller’s report, especially on the team’s handling of the obstruction investigation.

“The Special Adviser and his staff failed in their duty to act as prosecutors and only as prosecutors,” wrote Flood in a letter to the Bar Bill Barr, complaining that the report “suffers from an extraordinary legal deficiency” by failing to comply “with the requirements in governing law “.

WHITE HOUSE RIPS MUCH IN LETTERS TO DOJ, TEAM SAYS “COMPLETES IN YOUR DOMAIN TO ACT AS DEFENSE”

The flood raised concerns that the team did not reach a determination on the obstruction issue, but continues carefully with the probe’s results and includi Ng a pointed passage stating that the probe did not release the president. This passage read, “The evidence we have received about the President’s actions and intentions presents difficult problems that prevent us from definitively deciding that no crime occurred. Consequently, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it does not exclude him either.”

Flow-listed prosecutors “are simply not operating to establish innocence” and describe these as “political statements”. [1

9659005] But former official James Justice Trust has said he does not see the Mueller-Comey comparison.

“I think Mueller wrote an internal cross memo that takes into account the strengths and weaknesses of the obstruction and left it to his bosses,” he told Fox News.

“Both are surprising, because we didn’t know they were going to reach a non-decision. Comey’s message about the Clinton probe was one where he took it on to be the voice of the Justice Department, and it was wrong,” Trusty explained. , citing the fact that DOJ made the ultimate call. “But with Mueller, I think it is closer to recommend non-prosecution than people give credit.”

ile, former assistant FBI director Chris Swecker, who worked closely Mueller for half a decade, said that Comey “violated very clear cut rules”, while Mueller “made a very clear cut” on the Russian interrogation request and sent the obstruction decision to the lawyer general.

“Mueller understands the chain of command and knew that the decision was to go to Barr, “Swecker Fox News Tuesday said.” Unlike Comey, Mueller got the attorney general to play that role. Comey took the ball out of attorney General Lynch’s hands and did everything himself. “

Swecker added:” I think what Mueller did was okay, I would have liked to have seen him make the decision, but because there was some uncertainty, he had to place it with appropriate authority. “

But Comey himself said he thought it was” confusing “that Mueller did not come to a conclusion about obstruction.

” The part that is confusing is I cannot quite understand what is happening to the obstruction, “Comey says. , according to NBC News. “And I strongly believe in Bob Mueller, but I just can’t tell from the letter why he didn’t decide these issues when the whole ground for a particular piece of advice is to make sure the politicians don’t make the most important fee decisions”

Comey added that The fact that there was no underlying violation of conspiracy with the Russians, was an obstruction charge still a possibility.

“Obstructive crimes ignore what you prove about the underlying crime,” he said.

Fox News & # 39; John Roberts and Alex Pappas contributed to this report.

Share
Published by
Faela