Categories: world

Judges block Trump administration from adding citizenship question to 2020 census

A federal judge ruled against the Trump administration on Wednesday and blocked the Commerce Department from adding a citizenship issue to the US Census of 2020. Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California said the Minister of Commerce Wilbur Ross Wilbur Louis RossCommerce chief Wilbur Ross tries to postpone overview The appearance celebrates the emergence of minority-owned companies Governors bullish on infrastructure after Trump speaks MER had failed to offer a reasonable reason to add a citizenship question to the next census. "Secretary's Roses' trust in [Voting Rights Act] enforcement to justify the introduction of the citizenship issue was merely a pretext and the definition of an arbitrary and tricky government act," Seeborg wrote in his judgment. Adding the citizenship problem would allow the Census Bureau to get more "complete and accurate data" in response to the [Justice Department&#821 7;s] inquiry not only supported, it is directly contradicted by the scientific analysis in the management register, "continued Seeborg. [19659002] The management decision, which Ross announced in March, was immediately challenged by a number of states and localities led by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra Xavier BecerraOvernight Health Care – Presented by Kidney Care Partners – Drug Company offers cheaper insulin | California First State to sue the Trump abortion rule | FDA calls out resellers for tobacco sales to minors California first of 22 states to sue Trump over changes in the family planning program Overnight Health care: Drug concentrations set for grilling | is aimed at planned…

A federal judge ruled against the Trump administration on Wednesday and blocked the Commerce Department from adding a citizenship issue to the US Census of 2020.

Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California said the Minister of Commerce Wilbur Ross Wilbur Louis RossCommerce chief Wilbur Ross tries to postpone overview The appearance celebrates the emergence of minority-owned companies Governors bullish on infrastructure after Trump speaks MER had failed to offer a reasonable reason to add a citizenship question to the next census.

“Secretary’s Roses’ trust in [Voting Rights Act] enforcement to justify the introduction of the citizenship issue was merely a pretext and the definition of an arbitrary and tricky government act,” Seeborg wrote in his judgment.

Adding the citizenship problem would allow the Census Bureau to get more “complete and accurate data” in response to the [Justice Department&#821

7;s] inquiry not only supported, it is directly contradicted by the scientific analysis in the management register, “continued Seeborg. [19659002] The management decision, which Ross announced in March, was immediately challenged by a number of states and localities led by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra Xavier BecerraOvernight Health Care – Presented by Kidney Care Partners – Drug Company offers cheaper insulin | California First State to sue the Trump abortion rule | FDA calls out resellers for tobacco sales to minors California first of 22 states to sue Trump over changes in the family planning program Overnight Health care: Drug concentrations set for grilling | is aimed at planned parenting | Wyoming moves closer to the Medicaid labor requirements MORE (D), which previously said adding such a question would “track the integrity of the census” and potentially undercount the US population

“It would discourage non-citizens and their citizens in the family members from responding to the census, which resulted in a less accurate population number, “wrote Becerra in an up-ed last year.

The decision is the second blow to the Trump administration’s pressure to include the issue, after a New York judge made a similar ruling in January.

The Supreme Court is due to raise the issue in April, after justice agreed to skip the appeal process following the decision of New York.

The Ministry of Commerce claimed that the question was included in order to support the enforcement of the voting law.

Seeborg disagreed with his 126-sided judgment, which was critical for Rosss’s attempt to include the issue.

Seeborg wrote that Ross tried to justify the question of including it, even after receiving advice from the Census Bureau experts that it would reduce participation.

“What followed was a cynical search for some reason, reason or agency request to justify the predetermined result,” wrote Seeborg.

Share
Published by
Faela