Categories: world

Human ancestors at other humans because they were easier to catch

Cannibal human ancestors would kill and eat each other because it was "more cost effective" than catching animals, a new study claim. [ResearchersfoundarchaeologicalevidenceinSpainthatwassaidtoshow"unquestionablesignsofcannibalism"AnancienthumanspeciescalledHomoAntecessorandNeanderthals The analysis revealed that cannibalism was a good survival technique for the predecessors of homo sapiens because they would have spent much less time and energy catching other humans than fast animals, despite animal flesh being more calorific. The study, published in the Journal of Human Evolution, claims that human flesh would have been just as nutritious for the primitive people. The bones of seven individuals who showed evidence of being eaten humans were found at the archaeological site of Gran Dolina in Spain Evidence of being eaten by humans includes tooth marks, cuts and fractures made purpose completely to expose bone marrow The human remains were found among other mammalian species, including those who had not been eaten. Homo antecessor was one of the earliest known varieties of human discovered in Europe and lived there around one million years ago. Lead author of the study Jesús Rodríguez said: “Our analyzes show that homo antecessor, like any predator, selected its prey following the principle of optimizing the cost-benefit balance and they also show that considering only this balance, humans were a high-ranked prey type. "This means that when compared with other prey, a lot of food could be obtained from humans at low cost." that the cannibals may have eaten members of their own group when they died from other causes. Source link

Cannibal human ancestors would kill and eat each other because it was “more cost effective” than catching animals, a new study claim. [ResearchersfoundarchaeologicalevidenceinSpainthatwassaidtoshow”unquestionablesignsofcannibalism”AnancienthumanspeciescalledHomoAntecessorandNeanderthals

The analysis revealed that cannibalism was a good survival technique for the predecessors of homo sapiens because they would have spent much less time and energy catching other humans than fast animals, despite animal flesh being more calorific.

The study, published in the Journal of Human Evolution, claims that human flesh would have been just as nutritious for the primitive people.

The bones of seven individuals who showed evidence of being eaten humans were found at the archaeological site of Gran Dolina in Spain

Evidence of being eaten by humans includes tooth marks, cuts and fractures made purpose completely to expose bone marrow

The human remains were found among other mammalian species, including those who had not been eaten.

Homo antecessor was one of the earliest known varieties of human discovered in Europe and lived there around one million years ago.

Lead author of the study Jesús Rodríguez said: “Our analyzes show that homo antecessor, like any predator, selected its prey following the principle of optimizing the cost-benefit balance and they also show that considering only this balance, humans were a high-ranked prey type.

“This means that when compared with other prey, a lot of food could be obtained from humans at low cost.” that the cannibals may have eaten members of their own group when they died from other causes.


Source link

Share
Published by
Faela