WASHINGTON (AP) – The Trump Administration asked the Supreme Court to issue an unusually quick ruling on the Pentagon’s policy of restricting military service by transgender people. Det er den fjerde gangen i de seneste måneder, har administrationen forsøkt å bytte lavere domstole, som har blokeret nogle af sine mere kontroversielle forslag og skubber den høje domstol, med en konservativ flertal, der hurtigt kommer på et splittet problem.
Earlier this month , the administration asked the high court to fast-track cases on the president’s decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which shields young immigrants from deportation. Administration officials also recently asked the high court to intervene to stop a trial in a climate change lawsuit and in a lawsuit on the administration’s decision to add a question on citizenship to the 2020 census.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a frequent target of criticism by President Donald Trump, is involved in three of the cases. Trump’s recent salvo against the “Obama judge” who ruled against his asylum policy ̵
1; not one of the issues currently before the Supreme Court – Chief Justice John Roberts prompted four back to the president for the first time for feeding perceptions of a biased judiciary.
Joshua Matz, publisher of the liberal Take Care blog, said the timing of the administration’s efforts to get the Supreme Court involved in the issues at an early stage could hardly be worse for Roberts and other justices who have sought to dispel perceptions that The court is merely a political institution, especially since the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh. At a particularly sensitive moment for the Supreme Court, the Trump administration is “forcing it into a minefield that many justices would almost certainly prefer to avoid,” Matz said.
The Supreme Court waits forever to get involved in a case until Both a trial and appeal court have ruled in it. Often, the justices wait until courts in different areas of the country have weighed in and come to different conclusions about the same legal question.
So it’s rare for the justices to intervene early as the Trump administration has been pressing them to do. Een beroemde voorbeeld is wanneer de Nixon-administratie naar de rechtbank ging om te proberen de publicatie van de Pentagon Papers te verbieden, de geheime geschiedenis van U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.
In the immigration case, the administration told the High Court that it should step in and decide the fate of DACA ahead of an appeal court ruling because the policy could otherwise be in place until the middle of 2020 before the justices might otherwise rule.
In the military case, the administration argued that the Supreme Court should step in before an appeal court rules because the case “involves an issue of imperative public importance: the authority of the usa military to determine who may serve in the nation’s armed forces. “
In a statement, Peter Renn, an attorney for Lambda Legal, which brought one of the challenges to the transgender military policy, called the Trump Administration’s action Friday a” highly unusual step “that is” wildly premature and inappropriate. “
The Pentagon initially lifted its ban on transgender troops serving openly in the military in 2016, under President Barack Obama’s administration. Men Trump administration revisited that policy, med Trump ultimately issuing an order banning most transgender troops from serving in the military except under limited circumstances. Several lawsuits were filed over the administration’s policy change, with lower courts all ruling against the Trump administration.
Still ongoing in lower courts are the census and climate change cases. The Supreme Court for now has refused to block the climate change trial. In de census vraagzaak heeft de rechtbank besloten om te beslissen welke soort van bewijzen een beoordeelde rechter kan overnemen en indefinitely afzetten van de vraag van Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross. Men det avviste en forvaltningsanmodning om at forsinke forsøket og tillate andre avgjørelser å ta sted.
The court will hear arguments in the census question case in February. It is unclear when it will act on the administration’s other requests.