On Thursday and Friday, some Google employees reported that they were spoiled by how some executives accused of harassment were…
On Thursday and Friday, some Google employees reported that they were spoiled by how some executives accused of harassment were paid millions of dollars, even though the company was dependent on trials from former employees and the Labor Department claiming the underpaid women. Google has previously said that there had been “no significant difference” in the salary between men and women in the company.
Other employees said they were trying to calculate how many hours of their work would have gone to generate $ 90 million that Mr Rubin received in his starting package. Mr Rubin has denied any misunderstanding and said that the report of his compensation was a “wild exaggeration”.
Some workers said they wanted more information about how many allegations were being investigated and how many were found credible before the 48 people were interrupted, while others questioned the campaign and employment system, which allowed 13 people to become chief executives who shocked in the first place.
Liz Fong-Jones, a Google engineer for more than a decade and an activist on workplace issues, said in a tweet that judgment of misconduct may hide whether a person’s boss feels they can ” afford “to lose that person. As for Mr Rubin and others she said, putting Mr Page in the headlight.
“The ruler must have been Larry Page,” wrote Fong-Jones. “The bucket stays there.”
At the Google employee meeting Thursday, hours after the Alphabet reported quarterly blockbuster revenue, Page Page with employees spoke with Pichai and Naughton. It was unclear how they responded to the issue from employees, but the bosses made a reconciliation tone, according to The Times comments.
During the meeting, Mr. Page and Mr. Pichai not specific misconceptions. Mr Pichai noted that Google had made some “significant changes” in dealing with harassment, according to the comments.