Categories: world

Five takeaways from the first North Dakota senate debate

Then. Heidi Heitkamp Mary (Heidi) Kathryn HeitkampPoll: Dem Donnelly Has 4 Leadership In Indiana Senate War Choosing Countdown: Rourke goes…

Then. Heidi Heitkamp Mary (Heidi) Kathryn HeitkampPoll: Dem Donnelly Has 4 Leadership In Indiana Senate War Choosing Countdown: Rourke goes on attack | Takeaways from fiery other Texas senate debate | Heitkamp apologies for misidentification of suspected ads | Trump Jr. to gather for manchin challenger | Rick Scott leaves traces to deal with Hurricane Damage Heitkamp: Staffer no longer with campaign after the ad named addictions MER (DN.D.) And Rep. Kevin Cramer Kevin John CramerElection Countdown: O & # 39; Rourke goes on attack | Takeaways from fiery other Texas senate debate | Heitkamp apologies for misidentification of suspected ads | Trump Jr. to gather for manchin challenger | Rick Scott leaves track to deal with Hurricane Damage Heitkamp: Staffer no longer with campaign after ad named addictions Countdown: Dem’s Outraise GOP in Last Line | 2018 midterms already expensive in history | What to look at in the second Cruz-O & # 39; Rourke debate | Trump raises 0M for re-election | Why Dems Fear Avenida’s Approach MORE (RN.D.) Gone To Toe In A Heated Debate On Thursday, Trade Vouchers On Everything From President Trump Donald John TrumpTrump Renews Attacks Against Tests Over VA Nominee In The Evening In Montana rally Trump leaves 2017 federal income tax Corker: Trump administration “clamped down” on Saudi intelligence, interrupted briefing MORE s trade war with China for bitter campaign attack ads.

The debate marked First time, the two candidates met face to face in the contest to represent North Dakota in the Senate. Heitkamp, ​​who won his first senate competition in 2012, is among the most exposed Democrats seeking re-election this year.

Trump won in North Dakota Disability 2016 and Republicans see the state as prime territory to expand its narrow 51-49 Senate majority

The race grew increasingly tense in recent weeks in the wake of a partyis roar over Brett Kavanaugh [19659011] Brett Michael KavanaughProtesters confront Cruz at the airport over the Kavanaugh vote Trump renews attacks against VA nominee on the eve of Montana rally Corker: Trump administration clamped down on Saudi intelligence, interrupted briefing MORE s confirmation to the Supreme Court . That match – and several others – was on a full screen in the debate on Thursday.

Here are five of the most important takeaways:

Heitkamp defends reputation as a moderate

Heitkamp has received a reputation as one of the most moderate Democrats in the Senate and aggressively defended this reputation on thursday.

“I ran six years ago and I said” I’m not going to do anything, “she said.” I’m not 100 percent with anyone other than North Dakota. And I have been able to work over party leaders and achieve some rather extraordinary things. “

When answering a question about whether she supports privatization of the US postal service – a proposal from Trump – Heitkamp appointed his work with Rep. Mark Meadows Mark Randall Meadows Hills Morning Report – Presented by the coalition for Fusion GPS Founder Appeals Fifth In Congress, Advocate Counseling McCarthyism Fusion GPS Founder advocates the fifth following House GOP mood MORE (RN.C) .), Chairman of the Conservative House Freedom Caucus, on postal delivery and service issues.

“I think the future must be with people who are moderate. People who do not go, like Congressman Cramer, 100 percent of the time with a party. “

But Cramer dismissed Heitkamp’s allegations of bipartisanism and said” she was with Barack Obama Barack Hussein ObamaCampaign Staffers Illinois Applies Governor’s Candidate to Applied Racial Discrimination Bipartisanship is a Bigger Threat than Political Polarization The GOP Group then makes games in the Iowa seat once looked lost more almost 90 percent of the time. “

” The problem is that you can be on both teams and you might feel good about it, but when a team is so much better for North Dakota than the other team, you do not leave the good team halfway, “Cramer said. .

Cramer relates to Trump

If it was an argument that Cramer consistently raised on Thursday, he was standing with Trump and Trump standing with North Dakota.

“Donald Trump stands with North Dakota more often than Heidi Heitkamp stands with North Dakota,” said Cramer. “He’s on the right side of North Dakota. It’s so important.”

Throughout the hour-long debate, Cramer Trump’s work praised the office and criticized Heitkamp for just leading the president “50 percent of the time.” Cramer defended Trump’s trade war with China, promising him to raise military wages and his efforts to abolish the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Heitkamp shot back at one point and criticized the congressman for exercising Trump’s work more than his own work.

“I think it’s interesting that Congressman Cramer talks about President Trump,” she said. “Why not talk about what you’ve done? Why not talk about your achievements?”

Relitigating the Kavanaugh fight

Few Senate Races have seen the fight for justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court played a more prominent role. And on Thursday, both Heitkamp and Cramer tried to recover that fight.

Heitkamp invaded republican attacks earlier this month when she voted against Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court following allegations of sexual assault against the candidate.

But in his debate, both Heitkamp and Cramer dismissed the bitter party bust that broke out with Kavanaugh’s confirmation process.

“This process created a scene in Washington, DC and across the country that was inappropriate, it was unfair and it was not by either Senate or Supreme Court,” Heitkamp said.

For his part, Cramer defended Kavanaugh’s reputation as a lawyer and explained what he suggested was the bullying of democratic legislators.

“The process was cut off by a mob”, he later said to add: “We are happy, he has been confirmed.”

The most heated topic: An attack ad

The most heated change of close It was not over immigration. It was not over healthcare or military spending or trade. It was over an assault advertisement that accused Cramer of giving him a five-digit increase while serving on the North Dakota Public Service Commission.

Cramer raised the site twice in the long-term debate and accused Heitkamp of making it easy to authorize the advertisement.

“I still want to come to what you thought Sen. Heitkamp when you approved the ad saying that I voted for an increase of 23,000 for myself – that I raised myself,” he said. “You know it’s not true.”

Heitkamp responded to Cramer’s criticism at one time claiming that he should have held a salary on the Public Service Commission as promised when we were elected.

“You were chosen with that salary, you should keep that salary,” she said. It was a crazy response from Cramer, who turned out to be visibly irritated.

“That answer was so awesome that I would almost give you my 30 seconds to say it again,” he said. “Did you listen to yourself?”

Cramer served in the Public Service Commission from 2003 to 2012, and during that time his salary increased by approximately $ 25,000. However, the fact-finding website, PolitiFact, rated Heitkamp’s ad as “fake” and pointed out that Cramer did not approve of his own salary increase. It was rather approved by the state legislature.


Both Heitkamp and Cramer have tried to arm Trump’s commercial war. And the fight for customs was on full screen in Thursday’s debate.

Heitkamp hit the tariffs early in the evening and said that they would ultimately serve to make North Dakota less competitive not only nationally but internationally.

From the outset, I could see that these tariffs would have a very dramatic and negative impact on the farmers in North Dakota, “she said.

” We must realize that unless we trade in North Dakota products – we will not to succeed in the farm “

But Cramer largely defended the President’s tariffs, which led to reciprocal actions from China and other trading partners in the United States. He said he felt a duty to be with Trump on the matter.

” When our president chooses the tools he will use, I think we are obliged to stand with the United States, “he said. [19659008] Trump’s decision to impose hard taxes on tens of billions of Chinese products resulted in Beijing imposing obligations on US goods, including many agricultural products. tariffs have had a particularly hard impact on North Dakota’s soybean industry.

Published by