Categories: world

Five major takeaways from the federal climate change report

A new federal climate report released by the Trump Administration one day after Thanksgiving issues a sharp warning about climate…

A new federal climate report released by the Trump Administration one day after Thanksgiving issues a sharp warning about climate change.

Report’s message: Climate change is real, it is intensifying and it will destroy how people live. Daily, American leaders at all levels do not take drastic measures.

The recent Congress’s mandate report, called the fourth national climate assessment, shows that the effects of climate change ripple all over the world and adversely affect the health and well-being of the people.

More than 300 federal and non-federal researchers worked on the report, the first of its kind during the Trump administration, with its final review of 1

3 federal agencies.

Here are five things to know about the results of the report:

The report is in violation of statements made by Trump

President Trump Donald John TrumpAmazon’s European Workers Strike for Black Friday GOP Make Inroads with Hispanics in Florida Romney to host PAC fundraiser: Report MORE in recent months has doubled on his skepticism about climate change, accusing scientists to accommodate political agendas.

Climate researcher Phil Duffy in an interview with The Hill said the report is “remarkable” as it presents a “parallel universe” within the administration. On the one hand there are “federal bodies … which are with the general scientific consensus” and on the other hand, Trump says he is not “sure if climate change is” artificial. “

The report estimates that about 92 percent of climate change may attributed to the harmful effects of human action. “The climate of the Earth is now changing faster than in any way in the history of modern civilization, mainly as a result of human activities.”

Confronted by Axios reporters earlier this month, Trump acknowledged that there are climate change.

“Will it change? Probably, that’s what I think, “he told reporters.

But Gary Yohe, professor of economics and environmental studies serving at a National Academy of Sciences panel who reviewed the report, told The Hill that the climate will not” change

“The president is wrong,” he told Hill.

The report concludes that the effects of climate change can not be reversed, but say that the worst effects can be mitigated by aggressive action at all levels.

Its recommendations violate Trump’s deregulation agenda

The Trump Administration has conducted a largely liberalization calendar, reversing and rolling backstands that set limits for vehicle and power emissions dismantling of the application of clean water standards in some places, and often give preferences to oil and coal over alternative sources of energy.

Meanwhile, the report explains that k The glue change will lead to deteriorating water quality conditions and the highest temperatures ever recorded, which underlines the need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions drastically.

“While the fourth national climate assessment does not give any policy recommendations through design, it is certainly a convincing case that the White House should stop rolling back climate policy and acknowledge that a much larger response is required to essentially keep people safe,” Brenda Ekwurzel , climate researcher at the Union of Concerned Scientists and one of the authors of the report, told The Hill.

Derek Walker, vice president of the US climate at the environmental defense fund, slammed the agenda of the administration as “malpractice.”

“It’s like a doctor who diagnoses a patient with a very serious disease where the remedy is known and the doctor refuses to provide treatment,” Walker told The Hill. “It’s just malpractice.”

Dozens of environmental groups released similar statements after the release of the report, with many doubling it as a “cold to action”.

White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters said in a statement that the report is “largely based on the most extreme scenario that is in violation of long trends.”

Katherine Hayhoe, one of the authors of the report, reverted to that statement and called it “provenly false”.

“I wrote the climate scenarios myself so I can confirm that it takes into account all scenarios, from those where we go carbon negative before the end of the century until those coalslides continue to rise,” she tweeted.

Some claim that the report Black Friday release was intended to bury its findings

The Trump Administration came on fire on Friday to release the climate change report one day after Thanksgiving, when fewer Americans are likely to read the news.

He was originally reportedly slated for a December release, but it was ultimately touched with little explanation.

Yohe said representatives of the National Academy of Sciences told him on Wednesday that the report would be released this week. He claimed that the Trump Administration decided on the release date as part of a political strategy to bury the report’s results.

“This report is sent to the management and they decide what to do with it,” he pointed out.

“This is really a black Friday, but for all reasons,” says Aimee Delach, senior policy analyst for climate change with wildlife defenders.

The White House did not respond to Hills questions about the time of the release of the report. In a statement, spokesman Lindsay Walters spoke US efforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, pointing out that the report was partially collected under the Obama administration. The assessment has been in the work for three years.

Then. Sheldon Whitehouse Sheldon WhitehouseFuture investigators investigate possible violations of Whitaker Hatch Act Trump handpicked new AG “to bidding” in Russia’s probe, says Strategist Blumenthal: Whitaker appointment increases the risk of a slow-motion Saturday Night Massacre ” MORE (DR.I.) Said in a statement that the report’s results could not be buried “no matter how hard they try.”

“Serious consequences like collapsing housing prices and trillions of dollars in stranded fossil fuels assets await us we do not trade, “he said.

Climate change can cut up to 1/10 US GDP by 2100

The report allocates specific costs to the excitatory effects of a warming plan, and states that climate change could slash up a 10th of the United States Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by 2100.

Harmful weather alone, say h is costing the US nearly 400 billion dollars since 2015, and these costs are expected to increase only.

“Annual losses in some economic sectors are expected to reach hundreds of billions of dollars at the end of the century – more than current GDP (GDP) in many US states,” said the report. Rising sea levels and harmful storms will lower property values. Floods, hurricanes and fires will cost records to recover from.

Extreme heat can lead to a loss of half a billion working hours by 2100 just in the southeast.

“If we were going to lower emissions in the workforce, we could cut costs by almost half,” says ekwurzel.

The report predicts that heat-related deaths could cost up to $ 141 billion, ocean-level increases could cost $ 118 billion and infrastructure damage could cost $ 32 billion at the end of the century.

“The report concludes that these climate-related consequences will only worsen and their costs can be dramatically mounted if carbon dioxide emissions continue to be insoluble,” says Ekwurzel.

Climate change will have devastating impact on marginalized communities

Climate researchers have said for decades that marginalized populations, especially those in low-income communities and often people of color, will be the first and hardest affected by the effects of climate change.

Small and medium-sized communities are most exposed to the risks associated with rising temperatures, rising sea levels, deteriorating air and water quality and infrastructure damage.

Climate change does not affect everyone equally, says the report.

“Risks are often highest for those who are already vulnerable, including low income communities, some groups of color, children and the elderly,” the report says. “Climate change threatens to exacerbate existing social and economic inequalities that lead to higher exposure and sensitivity to extreme weather and climate-related events and other changes.”

“Climate change is really bad if you are young, old, elderly and sick or very poor,” said Yohe. “Because you are more sensitive to climate change and you have much less ability to protect yourself.”

He added that people who can often try to adapt to dramatic weather conditions.

“These investments are sometimes expensive, sometimes requiring some sophistication and knowledge and ability to take some time to figure out what to do to protect yourself,” you said.

But when they can not adapt, people can be displaced by extreme weather scenarios and leave them as “refugees in their own country,” Walker says.

Although it does not contain any political recommendations, the report says worst scenarios do not need to pop up. According to the report, such opportunities can be mitigated or even prevented if leaders work to focus their attention on existential threats.

“People should remove what we have now is not the new normal but it is a still image of a path to what will ultimately be the new normal,” Yohe said. “And there is still plenty of time to choose what new normal we want.”

Published by