Categories: world

Female journalists, politicians got abuse, hostile tweets every 30 seconds in study

Breaking News Emails Get deleted news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered everyday mornings. SUBSCRIBE Dec. 18, 2018 / 10:27 PM GMT By Elisha Fieldstadt Female journalists and politicians were sent in violence or other hostile tweets every 30 seconds on average in a study published Tuesday by Amnesty International. For the study Amnesty, using voluntary and global artificial intelligence software company Element AI, is sorted by 288,000 tweets sent to 778 female politicians and journalists in the UK and US last year. They found that 7 percent of the tweets they collected were addictive or otherwise problematic. Based on the extrapolated study figure, 7 percent of all estimated 1 4.5 million tweets that women received 1.1 million were violent, hostile or harmful, which lasts about every 30 seconds. There are 525,600 minutes in one year. The study also found that black, mixed race, Asian and Latin women were mentioned in abusive or problematic tweets 34 percent more often than white women, whereas black women specifically targeted 84 percent more often than white women. "Twitter's failure to break down this problem means it helps to silence already marginalized voices," said Milena Marin, senior research advisor at Amnesty, in a statement. study defined abusive tweets as those who "promote violence against or threaten people" based on race, sex or other identifiers. It was classified as "problematic" tweets that are harmful and hostile to a lesser extent. The study, called "Troll Patrol", did not indicate how many…

Breaking News Emails

Get deleted news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered everyday mornings.

By Elisha Fieldstadt

Female journalists and politicians were sent in violence or other hostile tweets every 30 seconds on average in a study published Tuesday by Amnesty International.

For the study Amnesty, using voluntary and global artificial intelligence software company Element AI, is sorted by 288,000 tweets sent to 778 female politicians and journalists in the UK and US last year. They found that 7 percent of the tweets they collected were addictive or otherwise problematic.

Based on the extrapolated study figure, 7 percent of all estimated 1

4.5 million tweets that women received 1.1 million were violent, hostile or harmful, which lasts about every 30 seconds. There are 525,600 minutes in one year.

The study also found that black, mixed race, Asian and Latin women were mentioned in abusive or problematic tweets 34 percent more often than white women, whereas black women specifically targeted 84 percent more often than white women.

“Twitter’s failure to break down this problem means it helps to silence already marginalized voices,” said Milena Marin, senior research advisor at Amnesty, in a statement.

study defined abusive tweets as those who “promote violence against or threaten people” based on race, sex or other identifiers. It was classified as “problematic” tweets that are harmful and hostile to a lesser extent.

The study, called “Troll Patrol”, did not indicate how many twins among the 288,000 were problematic and how many addicts, but Amnesty said Twitter should do more to show the hostile numbers on its site and to work to prevent it.

“Amnesty International has repeatedly asked Twitter to publish information about the extent and nature of abuse on their platform, but so far, the company has failed to do so,” Amnesty said in a statement. “This hides the scope of the problem and makes it difficult to design effective solutions. “

” Trollpatrol means we have data to back up which women have long been telling us that Twitter is a place where racism, misogyny and homophobia are allowed to flourish in principle without control, “says Marin in its statement.

Twitter says on its website that it prohibits abuse and uses both human analysis and artificial intelligence to track

“Twitter has publicly committed itself to improve collective health, openness and leadership in public discussion at our service, “Vijaya Gadde, a global political leader for the company said in a statement to NBC News.

He also said it was unclear how the Amnesty study categorized tweets as “problematic” or if the organization suggested such posts should be removed from Twitter.

Politicians in the study had different connections, and the journalists were from a broad group of media organizations, including The Daily Mail, The New York Times, The Guardian, The Sun and Breitbart. Even though the women in the survey received “similar levels of online abuse”, according to Amnesty.


Source link

Share
Published by
Faela