Categories: world

Facebook gift tech companies' intrusive 'access to users' private messages and personal data, internal documents reveal

Facebook reportedly gave other big tech companies "intrusive access" to the personal data of its 2.2. billion users – in some instances to private messages, usernames and contact information – raising questions about whether the company ran afoul of a 2011 agreement with the Federal Trade Commission. These secretive arrangements were ostensibly meant to benefit Facebook's never-ending push For growth and enable the companies it works with to add features to their products to improve them. Meningerne, som er baseret på over 270 sider af interne Facebook-dokumenter og interviews with about 50 former company employees. According to the Times, Facebook allowed Microsoft's Bing search engine to see the names of almost all Facebook users 'friends without consent and gave Netflix and Spotify access to Facebook users' private messages. The Mark Zuckerberg-led company allowed Amazon to get users' names and contact information through their friends and allowed Yahoo to view streams of friends posts. Facebook also reportedly allowed Spotify, Netflix and the Royal Bank of Canada to read and delete users' private messages and to see all participants on a thread. FEMALE JOURNALISTS AND POLITICIANS WERE ABUSED EVERY 30 SECONDS ON TWITTER IN 201 7 The deals detailed in the internal documents benefited over 150 companies, including some entertainment sites, automakers and media organizations. Deres applikasjoner samlet dataene fra hundrevis af millioner af personer pr. Måned, med den ældste avtalen dating til 2010, og de fleste tilbud er stadig aktive som i 2017. I en kommentar posted to its blog, Facebook…

Facebook reportedly gave other big tech companies “intrusive access” to the personal data of its 2.2. billion users – in some instances to private messages, usernames and contact information – raising questions about whether the company ran afoul of a 2011 agreement with the Federal Trade Commission.

These secretive arrangements were ostensibly meant to benefit Facebook’s never-ending push For growth and enable the companies it works with to add features to their products to improve them. Meningerne, som er baseret på over 270 sider af interne Facebook-dokumenter og interviews with about 50 former company employees.

According to the Times, Facebook allowed Microsoft’s Bing search engine to see the names of almost all Facebook users ‘friends without consent and gave Netflix and Spotify access to Facebook users’ private messages. The Mark Zuckerberg-led company allowed Amazon to get users’ names and contact information through their friends and allowed Yahoo to view streams of friends posts. Facebook also reportedly allowed Spotify, Netflix and the Royal Bank of Canada to read and delete users’ private messages and to see all participants on a thread.

FEMALE JOURNALISTS AND POLITICIANS WERE ABUSED EVERY 30 SECONDS ON TWITTER IN 201

7

The deals detailed in the internal documents benefited over 150 companies, including some entertainment sites, automakers and media organizations. Deres applikasjoner samlet dataene fra hundrevis af millioner af personer pr. Måned, med den ældste avtalen dating til 2010, og de fleste tilbud er stadig aktive som i 2017.

I en kommentar posted to its blog, Facebook sagde ingen af ​​disse funktioner eller partnerskaber gav companies access to information without people’s permission, nor did they violate its settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

First, people could access their Facebook accounts or specific Facebook features on devices and platforms built by other companies like Apple, Amazon, Blackberry and Yahoo. These are known as integration partners. Second, people could have more social experiences – like seeing recommendations from their Facebook friends – on other popular apps and websites like Netflix, The New York Times, Pandora and Spotify. “

The company said it has been public about these features and that many of the partnerships, w ith the exception of Amazon and Apple, have been shut down over the last few months. Facebook also noted in its blog post that users would have had to login with their Facebook account to use any integration offered by Apple, Amazon or other partners.

“Still, we recognize that we have needed tighter management about how partners and developers can access information using our APIs, “the company said in its statement. “

FACEBOOK BLASTED BY DOES OR CIVIL RIGHTS GROUPS FOR GENERATION BIGOTRY

Over the years, different studies have confirmed that most people do not read the fine print buried in terms of service agreements. Data privacy experts pushed back on Facebook’s assertions that the partnerships were all over board.

“The only common theme is that they are partnerships that would benefit the company in terms of development or growth into an area that they otherwise could not access Two, “Ashkan Soltani, former chief technologist at the FTC, told the Times.

Another former FTC employee said the data sharing probably violated the 2011 consent decree.

” This is just giving third parties permission to harvest data David Vladeck, die vroeger het FTC’s consumentenbeschermingsbureau heeft getrapt, vertelde de krant. “I do not understand how this unconsented-to data harvesting can at all be justified under the consent decree.”

Nick Stamos, Facebook’s former chief security officer, tweeted that Facebook bungled its response to the Times investigation by blending “all kinds of different integrations and models into a bunch of prose, “making it hard to match the company’s response with the Times’ reporting. Still, he did defend his former employer, noting that third party client access is a “pro-competitive move.”

Stamos gave the following advice to Facebook: “What they really need is a table som blir opdateret om de næste flere dagene som lister på virksomheden, hvilken type integration, hvilke data var tilgængelige, hvilke trin en bruger tog for at aktivere integrationen, og hvornår det var lukket. “

Amazon, Microsoft and Yahoo representatives told the Times that they used the data appropriately, but they would not discuss the arrangements in detail. Netflix said in a tweet on Wednesday that it “never asked for, or accessed, anyone’s private messages,” adding, “We’re not the type to slide into your DMs.” Spotify told the Times that it was unaware of the access Facebook had given them, while a Royal Bank of Canada spokesman disputed that the bank had such access.

SHOCKING SCALE OF RUSSIA’S SINISTER SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN AGAINST US REVEALED

Among the revealed partnerships, which the Times reports are only a fraction of such deals, was that Facebook obtained data from multiple partners for a controversial feature called People You May Know. ” That feature, which was introduced for a decade ago, still continues despite the fact that users have reported to other news outlets that it would recommend connections between harassers and victims or between patients of the same psychiatrist.

“Facebook, in turn, used contact lists from the partners, including Amazon, Yahoo and the Chinese company Huawei – which has been flagged as a security threat by American intelligence officials – to gain deeper insight into people’s relationships and suggest more connections, the records show, “the Times reports.

In this Sept. 5, 2018, file photo Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington.
(AP)

The Times also uncovered more information about the details and reach of sharing deals that Facebook made with over 60 makers of smartphones and tablets.

That included a partnership with Apple which reportedly allowed Apple “to Apple devices had access to the contact numbers and calendar entries of people who had changed their account settings to disable all sharing. “

BIG TECH’S DISASTERS & DEBACLES: FACEBOOK, GOOGLE, TWITTER AND AMAZON’S TORTUROUS 2018

Apple told the Times it was not aware of any special access granted by Facebook, adding that any shared data remained on devices and was not available to anyone other than the users.

Similarly, Facebook’s record on user privacy – given the Cambridge Analytica data scandal and the more recent bug involving users’ photos – is not exactly stellar.

According to the Ti knife, two forms Facebook employees also said that many of these special sharing partnerships, which were largely negotiated by more senior officials at the company, were not subjected to extensive privacy program reviews. Facebook said the level of review “Depended on the specific partnership and the time it was created.”

Pam Dixon, executive director of the World Privacy Forum, a nonprofit privacy research group, said that Facebook would have little power over what happens to users’ information after sharing it broadly. “It travels,” Ms. Dixon said. “It could be customized.

Other privacy advocates faulted the FTC for not reining in the tech giant.

“There has been an endless barrage of how Facebook has ignored users’ privacy settings, and we truly believed that in 2011 we had solved this problem, “Marc Rotenberg, head of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, an online privacy group that filed one of the first complaints about Facebook with federal regulators, customs the times. “We brought Facebook under the regulatory authority of the FTC after a tremendous amount of work. The FTC has failed to act. “

US UNABLE TO DEFEND AGAINST RUSSIAN AND CHINESE HYPERSONIC WEAPONS, REPORT SAYS

Facebook claims these data partnerships fall under an exemption to the FTC agreement because the partner companies

However, former FTC officials told the newspaper that Facebook was interpreting the exception too broadly, that is, the fact that Facebook was interpreting the exception too broadly, og at tilskuddene var ment å tillate Facebook at udføre grundlæggende, daglige funktioner, såsom at sende og modtage information over internettet eller behandle kreditkorttransaktioner uden at krænke samtykkedekretet.

En anden såkaldt integrationspartner var den russiske søgning company Yandex, which had access to Facebook’s unique user IDs in 2017. A spokeswoman for Yandex, which was accused last year by Ukraine’s security service of funneling it s user data to the Kremlin, said the company was unaware of the access and did not know why Facebook had allowed it to continue. She also told the Times that the Ukrainian allegations “have no merit.”

Share
Published by
Faela