Categories: world

Dozens more breakfast foods test positive for trace amounts of weed killers, says the report

Closeup of girl wearing school Uniform Eating Bowl With Sugary Breakfast Cereal In Kitchen Closeup Of Girl On School Uniform…

Closeup of girl wearing school Uniform Eating Bowl With Sugary Breakfast Cereal In Kitchen

Dozens of common breakfast flakes and snack bars have traces of a controversial herbicide that was found in the weed killer Roundup, according to a report released today by an environmental advocacy group.

The Environmental Working Group (EWG) found that 26 of the 28 products tested had levels of Roundup’s main ingredient, glyphosate, which was “higher than EWG researchers consider protecting children‘s health.” A previous report found similar results in over thirty oats-based foods.

Manufacturers say their products are safe, but the EWG report claims that the vast majority of foodstuffs tested – such as honey noodles and Quaker Simply Granola oats – have glyphosate levels that can constitute a cancer risk with long-term consumption.

N One of the foods violates the EPA limits of the herbicide, but the EWG uses a much more conservative health index. California’s proposed glyphosate limit, which would be the most restrictive in the country, still allows glyphosate levels that are more than hundred times higher than the EWG threshold.

The environmental group says that its lower threshold contains an additional buffer for children, as “Early Life Exposure can have more significant effects on later life developments,” said Professor Alexis Temkin, senior researcher at the EWG report.

But manufacturers doubt the threshold. Quaker said in a statement that “The EWG report artificially creates a” safe level “for glyphosate that is separate from those set up by responsible regulatory bodies in an attempt to grab headlines.”

General Mills, whose products were also cited in the report, claimed that glyphosate levels in its food do not pose any health risks. “The extremely low levels of pesticide residues cited in the latest news reports are a small part of the amount of government allowed,” the company said in a statement to CNN. “19659004” Consumers are regularly hit by scary headlines but rarely have time to weigh the information for themselves, “the company said.” We believe this is an important context that consumers should be aware of when considering this topic. “

Herbicide Producer Ordered To Pay 78 Million Dollars To Cancer Victims

In August, a jury in San Francisco Roundup’s manufacturer, Monsanto, ordered to pay $ 289 million in damages to a school who claimed that the glyphosate-based weed killer caused his cancer. A judge on Monday enforced that decision but made Monsanto payment to $ 78 million.

The pharmacist Bayer recently bought Monsanto and said in a statement that the company plans to appeal the court’s decision. “Glyphosate-based herbicides have been used safely and successfully for over four decades worldwide,” said the company in a statement to CNN.

“There are extensive research on glyphosate and glyphosate based herbicides, including more than 800 rigorous registration studies required by EPA, European and other regulatory authorities, confirming that these products are safe when used according to the instructions. “

EPA concluded in 2017 that glyphosate” probably is not carcinogenic to humans, “but a World Health Organization, the International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC), decided in 2015 that glyphosate is” probably cancer-causing to humans. “

Dr. Chensheng Lu, Professor of Environmental Exposure Biology at Harvard TH Chan’s School of Public Health, defended the WHO Group, called it “a world renowned and reputable academic and research institute in cancer epidemiology.”

The EPA, on the other hand, is “a regulatory body and in many ways a political body, “he said.” In 2018, I would not hold EPA’s view of glyphosate as a fact. “

Confusion Overcomes the Risk of Glyphosate Cancer

The IARC has strongly defended its results but a separate WHO panel assessing pesticide residues decided years 2016 that “glyphosate is unlikely to constitute a carcinogenic risk to people from exposure through the diet”, and adds a dizzying range of contradictory results.

Authors conclude that they are not uncommon in cancer research, according to Dr. Otis W. Brawley, Chief Cancer Officer and Chief Scientist of the United States of America.

“IARC thinks I am very, very reasonable in its assessments,” he said, “but IARC will sometimes make an assessment that is unsatisfactory for many of us.” [19659004] Brawley noted that the other commonly used substances are also classified as potentially carcinogenic by the IARC. Based on limited evidence, the IARC says, for example, that “drinking very hot drinks probably causes cancer in the esophagus in humans”, but hundreds of millions of people drink coffee every day.

“There are some groups that really want to alert people and advocate what is called the precautionary principle,” said Brawley. “The precautionary principle, to its utmost, means you should not literally go up in the morning.”

Brawley said that parents should instead ensure that their children eat fruit, vegetables and get the nutrition they need. More children “will definitely be hurt by inappropriate diets, he says,” than with a small amount of glyphosate in oatmeal. “

How much glyphosate is too much?

Glyphosate can make its way to processed foods after being used on farms that grow oats. “Most crops grown in fields use some form of pesticides and trace amounts are found in most foods we all eat,” said General Mills in a statement.

“We continue to work close to farmers, our suppliers and conservation organizations to minimize the use of pesticides on the ingredients we use in our food, “says the company.

Nevertheless, some experts urge parents to be vigilant.” I think it is very important for people to realize how widespread exposure to glyphosate is, “says Dr. Sarah Evans, a deputy professor at the Icahn School of Medicine on Mount Sinai.

” There are things in the foods that they buy that are not on the label and that they probably do not want to give their children, “said Evans, who also works at the Mount Sinai Children’s Environmental Health Center.

“I do not think people should be hysterical,” she said, “but people must be really aware of where their food comes from and what comes into their food.”

And when it’s about children believe Harvard’s Lu that the parents would be wrong at the side of warning. “What’s more scary?” He asked. “Does cereal choose between organic and conventional or is told by your doctor that you or your children have cancer?”

EWG’s previous report found glyphosate in 5 of the 16 organic breakfast samples they tested, but none of these levels exceeded the group’s health balance. Temkin, who was also the lead author of that report, said parents did not have to “throw out his half-eighth box of cheerios” than.

“We talk about lifetime cumulative exposure,” she said. “But if you want to reduce your risk, we know that organic oats and organic cereals are a better option.”

Published by