Categories: world

Doctors start motion in response to NRA, requires more weapons research | Health-med-fit

The National Rifle Association and the medical community are still collapsing, with the latest episode from doctors who released an…

The National Rifle Association and the medical community are still collapsing, with the latest episode from doctors who released an editorial statement that they do not agree with the NRA, published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine on Monday.

The NRA, like marked 147 years as an active organization this weekend, wrote in the tweet: “Someone should tell self-weighted anti-gun doctors to stay in their lane. Half of the articles in Annals of The Internal The medication is in charge of pistol control. Most disturbances are, however, that medical society seems to have heard NOW but themselves. “

Several tweets from physicians, including trauma surgeons and emergency recipients, included graphic images of which work tables or hospitals scrubs may look in bloody aftermath of a shooting year.

In response to the national supervisory authority, Dr. Sue Bornstein, chairman of the American College of Physicians, Health and Policy Committee, c o-wrote Monday’s new editorial with the editorial editor of the magazine, Christine Laine, and executive editor, Dr. Darren Taichman.

In addition to taking care of gun-related injuries and their long-term consequences, “we need rigorous research to better understand the crisis, test solutions and learn how to best perform and retain those who work,” they wrote.

“So far, the ability to study key issues that can help reduce weapons-related harm has come from lack of funding and concern among researchers studying anything that concerns weapons can risk their research career.” This has to be resolved, “they wrote.

CNN has contacted the NRA for an answer to the editorial staff but the organization has not responded.

The editorial board noted that Annals of Internal Medicine and the American College of Physicians collaborate with the ideal American foundation for firearms reduction in medicine to promote violence related violence.

“In addition to providing funding for research, AFFIRM aims to sponsor the development of practical recommendations based on audio and education and training to implement them,” wrote Taichman, Bornstein and Laine.

“Doctors have a responsibility as healthcare professionals and researchers to seek answers to health and safety issues. And we will not be quiet in using what we learn better to take care of our patients,” they wrote. ” Those who try to silence progress towards finding solutions to the crisis in firearms-related damage, travel a lane that leads, literally, to a blind man. We will stay in our lane and keep moving forward. “

Gun violence has also continued to be a big area of ​​interest among researchers outside the medical community. On Friday, a panel of gun violence experts presented their latest discoveries and what the public can teach them at the American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting in Atlanta.

“Doctors, especially trauma physiotherapists and emergency medical doctors, see the end result of violence violence and it’s a very brutal, powerful thing. One thing that is obvious to many of them is that these damage is so devastating, prevention is particularly important,” said Webster.

For example, “about 60% of people who die in the United States are a suicide, and doctors can actually play a greater role in suicide than in murder. They encounter patients who are depressed, who may have addiction disorders, mental problems, a variety of things that can increase the risk of suicide, “said Webster.

“While they are interested in getting them the best health and medical care to deal with these things, to keep them alive, is one of the most important things to remove firearms,” ​​he says. “It’s so important to talk with patients and their families about the removal of firearms and the safe storage of firearms. &#821

1; And it’s a very important role for doctors, and I’m very happy that many of them take it on. “

” It As we know in the criminology literature, for example, when people refrain from crimes when they stop committing crimes, it is usually because of someone who is important in their lives. But it’s not always the same person – it may be a husband it can be a trainer it can be an employer It may be a teacher – that has affected them, says McDevitt.

“Then you have another voice of a physician respected who says:” You know, maybe you want to take out the weapon Out of the house temporarily? Or, you might want to think on the different? Or, “Here’s a program you might want to go to.” I think there’s nothing wrong with that, he says. “They can not force anyone to do anything, but they can sometimes express it within the context of” I’m Worried About Your Health “as opposed to” I want to remove your weapons. “”

Published by