Categories: world

Congress gets a rude awakening in Saudi Arabia

C Weed can often be a slow, difficult train where even the common sense's proposals can get caught in the…

C Weed can often be a slow, difficult train where even the common sense’s proposals can get caught in the bureaucracy and politics of machinery. In too many cases, it takes a foreign policy or a domestic crisis to lead congressional leaders from their suicide.

The brutal, state-sanctioned murder of Saudi Arabian journalist Jamal Khashoggi, a crimes commissioned by the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, is one of these events. Legislators on both sides of the political era have come together in rare bipartisanship not only to condemn the murder, but to urge the Trump administration to take sanctions against the Saudi government in response.

The Republican President and Democratic Parliamentary Member of the Senate Union Foreign Affairs Committee called on the White House to decide whether Crown Prince Mohammed was in any way responsible for the death of Khashoggi &#821

1; a determination that could lead to freezing of assets and visa restrictions. Rope. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Incoming Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has promised a “deep dive” to the US-Saudi relationship as a whole. And the Senate demanded an all-senate information from administrative officials this week, ranging from the Khashoggia affair to the war in Yemen. A conflict like Washington undoubtedly and unconstitutional has helped and elevated on behalf of the Saudi Arabian and UAE-led military coalition for the last three and a half years.

The trumpet administration, which has largely given Saudi Arabia the benefits of doubts as well as unconditional support (which is neither in the United States national security interest) is now under pressure from Capitol Hill to (at least) undergone a review of its policy. The past month has illustrated how Congress can have a positive impact on politics.

The Constitution’s Extractor would not have it in any other way. The framers gathered in Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention in 1787 were deeply known for how dangerous an American style monarchy would be for a person’s personal freedom and for the development of a good policy. An unbalanced system of government would be anathema for public accountability and with the consent of the rulers. Giving royal powers to a president would set a height in a quasi-monarchy, where decisions affecting the nation’s prosperity and security were made by an individual.

The Legislative Department has extraordinary power in terms of foreign policy, from deciding when it is in national interest for the United States to go to war, which of the President’s priorities and programs is funded. When legislators can reconcile political differences in a matter, Congress can limit the executive branch and sometimes force the president to change politics. For example, the families of September 11 victims would not have the legal right today to take Saudi Arabia to correct the Kingdom’s accession to the attack unless it was Congress’s decision to override President V Barack Obama’s veto.

President Trump may not appreciate what he is likely to be guessing from Capitol Hill, especially when he tries to maintain a business relationship with Riyadh, but he is bound to respect it. Congress is not a peanut gallery offering worthless advice from the Bleachers. Congress can act as a star player in the field that can affect what the end result will be.

By demanding response to the Khashoggi killing; government officials in private briefings and public hearings argue why government still believes that the Saudi government deserves unrestricted US support and force foreign policy bureaucracy to rethink a bilateral relationship based on principles that are very outdated, legislators comply with their constitutional obligations.

Saudi Arabia is not a strategic allied in the United States, nor is it a particularly helpful security partner. Saudis is like all other Middle East players: oppressive and antidemocratic, but useful when adapting our interests to counterrorrorism. If or when Trump finally comes to the conclusion, we have Congress to thank.

Daniel DePetris ( @DanDePetris ) is a contributor to the Washington Examiner’s Beltway Confidential blog. He is a colleague in defense priorities.

window.fbAsyncInit = function () { FB.init ({

AppId: & # 39; 190451957673826 & # 39 ;,

xfbml: true, version: & # 39; v2.9 & # 39; }); };

(function (d, s, id) { where js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName (s) [0]; to (d.getElementById (id)) {return;} js = d.createElement (s); = id; js.src = “”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore (js, fjs); } (document, “script”, “facebook-jssdk”));
Source link

Published by