China holds 1 million people in secret indoctrination camps, separated from their families in conditions that have led to suicide…
China holds 1 million people in secret indoctrination camps, separated from their families in conditions that have led to suicide attempts and deaths. The reason for this is Islam.
International disqualification over the fate of these prisoners – Muslims in China, the vast majority of members of an ethnic minority group called the Uighurs – have reached an unprecedented level this year with the United Nations confirming the number of prisoners in August. Congress wants sanctions, and European officials call for independent investigations of the facilities.
But the western world, the world’s self-made freedom defender, hamsters: China, despite its playbook, follows the risks of the 1
.6 billion people in the world associated with Islam.
Even as Beijing has felt sufficiently pressured to give up its old strategy to deny the existence of such camps, it still feels safe to defend its attitude towards the Uighurs. “It’s the necessary way to deal with Islamic or religious extremism,” said Li Xiaojun, a Chinese government spokesman, to reporters this year. On November 13, China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi doubled and said: “The efforts are fully in line with the direction the international community has taken to combat terrorism and is an important part of the global fight against terrorism.”
Chinese Government Claims The Uighurs are “infected” with the wrong type of thinking and linked the disease to their Muslim beliefs. Its “cure” is to limit the length of men’s beard, regulate women’s clothes in public places and counteract the use of Muslim names.
The government’s supporters argue that it is only meaningful for the rest of the world to support China despite credible accusations of government defamation, abduction and tracing of millions of people based on mandatory DNA and voice sample databases simply because of who they are. Countries should “close joints”, says Victor Gao, vice president of the Chinese government’s linked mindset Center for China and Globalization. Popular very right skeptics in Islam in the west agreement .
While experts and most international governments see little evidence of serious radicalization or links with international terrorism among Uighurs, the argument is legitimate. China’s strategy uses smart assumptions about what is appropriate for combating terrorism as the world has been fed in years of muddying water in global opinion, especially among Western political and business leaders whose decisions can really hurt China and make it easier to continue the biggest violations of human rights since the Mao Cultural Revolution.
The United States, the strongest critic of China’s Uighur politics, has for several years helped to lay the foundations for its success. Since the attacks in September 11, Washington officials have focused the resources and influence of the world’s single superpower on an amorphous mission whose goal is still unclear several wars later, but whose fixation on a threat fooling in Islam has never been in doubt. Powerful American police disputes about their counter-terrorism strategy focus on the degree – from sweeping ban on Muslims to snoop on student groups – but t his overall necessity is not questioned.
As US government officials have created shadowy standards that allow military strikes even against unknown individuals and as the surveillance and indefinite detention of democratic governments have become [rigorous]the rest of the world has bomatized. If it’s the war on terrorism, it’s okay – so now it’s all the war on terrorism.
Syrian President Bashar Assad says he has to slaughter thousands of his own people to fight the fundamentalists. The Government of Denmark motivates to distinguish “ghetto children” in Muslim areas from their families for 25 hours a week from the age of 1; The American Nativist’s Link Policy to maintains a white majority in the United States for the need to “find out what the tab is going on” for “Islam hates us.”
Beijing saw an opportunity early. Millions of Uighurs and other non-Han Chinese groups in the northwestern part of Xinjiang had prayed for increased autonomy for decades, with points that coincided with violent separatist movements and militias. A small proportion had turned to religiously inspired militia.
In the months after September 11, China began to present almost all Uighur opposites associated with Islam and the global network of groups such as Al-Qaeda, Chien-Peng Chung, a Professor at Singapore’s Defense Institute and Strategic Studies, noted in an article published in the summer of 2002.
“The fact is that separatist violence in Xinjiang is not new or primarily driven by third parties,” continued Chung. “The latest wave of Uighur separatism has been inspired by Osama bin Laden, but through the Soviet Union’s fall, as militants try to imitate the independence that some Muslim communities in central Asia have received.”
Autumn 2001, Uighurs who had sought refuge in Afghanistan began flying to neighbor Pakistan when US troops invaded. Bounty hunters who are keen on American payments for anyone who may be linked to al-Qaeda finally caught at least 22 of them. US forces eventually sent the group to Guantanamo Bay and accused them of working with Al Qaeda and the Taliban as part of a Uighur group called the Eastern Turkish Islamic Movement (ETIM).
On September 3, 2002, the United States expressly linked its own war on terrorism to China by placing the Uighur Group on the Ministry of Finance’s list of terrorist organizations. In general, President George W. Bush’s aides talked about spreading freedom and said they told Beijing that it could not use the listing to motivate further oppression against the broader Uighur community. Private American officials invited Chinese officials to Gitmo to question the Uighurs there – expose them to sleep deprivation the night before by waking them every 15 minutes, according to the Justice Department’s first official confirmation of the incident in 2008.
U.S. Officials closed quietly at the end of 2003 that the Uighur prisoners were not security risks, and when pro bono lawyers began to question prison prisons, the United States released five to Albania in 2006. In 2009, a federal judge decided that they should be released also because “the government had not provided sufficient evidence that ETIM was associated with al Qaida or the Taliban or had been engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partner. ” The Obama administration found new homes for the remaining Uighurs until 2014.
Today, the expert’s consensus remains that Uighur radicalization exists but has a limited impact on China’s security – much less global stability.
Members of society travel to Syria to join rebellion against Assad, many under the banner of an organization called Turkestan Islamic Party, which is generally considered an offshoot of ETIM. There is a good chance that at least a few thousand were involved in groups that were affiliated with Al Qaeda. The United Kingdom added ETIM to its own terrorist list 2016, after the United States and the United Nations
And Uighurs committed violent attacks in China in recent years claiming hundreds of lives, especially in 2014.
But it is difficult to find clear links between these incidents and global Islamic terrorism – and to get intelligence from Chinese authorities to prove their case difficult for Western governments to realize Beijing’s desire to force any Uighur assertiveness by treat peaceful organizations as threats.
“China tries to be gently blurred between these groups,” Peter Irwin of the Uyghur Congress, a Europe-based group, one of the organizations that Beijing considers to be a terrorist group, told HuffPost in an email.
The United States has its own recent experience of blurred lines between real terrorist targets and those treated solely as fair play or security damage. As Washington calls on China’s surplus against the Uighurs among a wider policy of competition with Beijing, this story will weigh bigger and bigger.