A research study claims that people who eat organic food tend to slash their cancer risk by as much as…
A research study claims that people who eat organic food tend to slash their cancer risk by as much as 25 percent – but what does this study really tell us?
The research conducted by French scientists using government and public funds , såg at de sundhedsdataene for 68.946 franske voksne, hvorav de fleste var kvinner i deres 40s.
Under den studieopfølgningsperiode, som varierede for hver deltager, men forlænget til omkring fire og et halvt år for de fleste, var der 1.340 kræftformer. The highest rate was in breast cancer, but prostate cancer, skin cancer, colorectal cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphomas were also statistically significant.
The researchers found that the group who ate the most organic food had 25 percent fewer cancer cases than those who ate the least. That’s a big difference, and the researchers say they were surprised that the figure was so strong. Participants who ate the most organic food were 73 percent less likely to develop non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, while they were also 21
percent less likely to develop breast cancer.
These findings are impressive, and they led the researchers to conclude: “A hogere frequentie van organische voedsel consumptie was geassocieerd met een verminderde risico van kanker. Selv om de undersøgelsesresultater skal bekræftes, fremme økologisk fødevareforbrug i den generelle befolkning kan være en lovende forebyggende strategi mod kræft. “
Denne undersøgelse er et omfattende og befolkningsrepræsentativt kohortstudie. It is reasonably well designed and appears to give us some valuable insights into something surrounding the potential health benefits of people adopting an organic diet.
The study does not prove that organic food cuts cancer risk.
Sadly, while the study is impressive in scope, it can not say That organic food cuts cancer rates.
While the researchers found that even people who ate less healthily but still consumed some organic products tended to have lower levels of cancer, the research does not prove it is organic produce that provides this benefit . Rather, it demonstrates that people who are diet-aware enough to have chosen organic over non-organic appear to be ahead of the game in terms of cancer prevention.
That’s not such a shocker. Vi vet at disse typer av habits sjældent sker i en vakuum, så det er sannsynlig at folk som velger økologiske er mer bevisst på deres overordnede helse og er å ta skritt som å spise et bredt utvalg av frukt og veg og trening. being. Disse habits definitivt tilby cancerbeskyttelse, men det er ikke nødvendigvis den økologiske fødevaren selv, snarere den del det kan spille i en overordnet sund livsstil.
Det sagt, en anden storskalig undersøgelse som såg på økologisk fødevare på denne måde fundet no meaningful reduction in cancer rates overall except for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
For argument’s sake, let’s say we were to buy in organic food cutting cancer risk. If it does, it’s probably not because of the nutritional profile of the food, which studies have tended to show is comparable to conventional produce. Rather, the most likely culprit would be pesticides.
Other research has speculated that organic produce may be better for us because, by its nature, it should shun the majority of pesticides. Research has corroborated that people who eat organic tend to have lower levels of pesticides in their urine.
Farming groups that support pesticides point to decades of studies that say pesticides are safe and safe, and there are a lot of pesticides that are safe and safe. dat de werkelijke blootstelling voor het publiek is laag. Indeed, there is a large body of independent research to corroborate that in trace amounts of pesticides and synthetic fertilizers pose no risk to human health and, crucially for our purposes, are not actively cancer-causing.
If you sense a but you would be right.
It is critical to acknowledge the above, however, some researchers have flagged that those past studies have one major blind spot: how common pesticide use is now. Few studies have looked at pesticide exposure at the rate that we currently experience it, so while exposure to the very, very small level of pesticides in each single item of produce we consume is almost definitely safe, we have yet to understand the cumulative effects of
Bijvoorbeeld, de Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie stelt vast dat cumulatieve blootstellingen voor kinderen in plattelandsgebieden eigenlijk de veiligheidsgrenzen overschrijden. De Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie sets pesticiden, waardoor de blootstelling door dieet en door dingen like water contamination is something we have to be mindful of. At the very least, we know that at the most extreme levels of exposure faced by rural communities, health problems do go up.
Clearly, there needs to be more research into this very important topic. De store takeaway på dette stadiet for os som forbrugere, men er sikkert noget vi allerede ved: at spise en sund og afbalanceret kost og være bevidst om vores valg .
Photo credit: Thinkstock.
Photo credit: Thinkstock.