The questionnaire adds indications that Mueller sees false or misleading statements to the press or to the public as a…
The questionnaire adds indications that Mueller sees false or misleading statements to the press or to the public as a barrier to justice. It could set up a potential flashpoint with the White House and the law if Trump should become part of each final report from the Mueller survey.
Mueller has not raised the issue publicly, but prosecutors have released tips as they publicly see statements such as any important impact on witnesses.
The court application by Michael Cohen, the president’s former personal lawyer, included allegations of false public statements – usually not considered illegal because they are not made directly to investigators. A December memorandum from Mueller’s office notes that Cohn’s lies were reinforced in public statements, “including other potential witnesses”. The memorandum states that this was partly done “in the hope of limiting the investigation into possible Russian involvement in the presidential election in 201
6 in the US – a problem of increased national interest”.
The chairman’s law took note of the Cohen care documents and believes that the specialist adviser has a thin legal theory regarding potentially criminalizing public statements, a source said. They believe that the President’s comments are protected under the first amendment and that there is a difference between an action and the President’s position, which is to fight the charges.
When Mueller’s investigation ends, the moment is expected to mark the beginning of a new political and legal battle against the probe’s results.
One of the key areas of dispute that is likely to concentrate on obstruction of fair claims, which the President’s law has considered beyond the borders of claiming that these are issues covered by privileged privileges. When Trump responded to written questions from Mueller before Thanksgiving, Presidential lawyers refused to answer questions about obstacles.
Mueller is not expected to attempt to bring an action against the President, having followed the legal guidelines of the Legal Department, investigators may attempt to intervene in their report examples of how the President used public statements to attempt to impede the investigation. Mueller’s questionnaire also shows that their interest in obstruction extends beyond the president’s interruption of the FBI director James Comey
A witness who worked near Trump told CNN that on the basis of the questions, it is clear that Mueller is looking at the president’s “changing stories” as a way to possibly show corrupt intentions in the obstruction probe.
Prosecutors also appear to investigate the President’s public statements to determine if there are efforts to try to influence other witnesses and to make other administrations and past campaigns serve to make false public statements.
It includes the president’s role in the creation The misleading Air Force One statement in the summer of 2017 at the now notorious June 2016-Trump Tower meeting with Russians who participated in Donald Trump Jr., the president’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and then campaign chairman Paul Manafort.
Another episode centers on Trump’s attempt to get his then White House Don McGahn disavow articles reporting that McGahn threatened to stop over Trump’s pressure on Fire Mueller, according to a source familiar with the case. McGahn refused to publicly say that the stories were false, leading to more anger from the president.
The President has publicly stated that he would not shoot Mueller and not think of what other witnesses have said to Mueller’s investigators is not “
 While clues state that Mueller ends his multi-year investigation over the next few weeks, new political and legal battles will come over who will actually be able to read his findings.
It is a battle the White House and Congress are already preparing to determine if any of the report Mueller produces goes to the congress or any part of it becomes public.
President Donald Trump would not state Thursday if he wants Mueller’s final report to be published and tell reporters: “We must see.”
But behind the scenes at the White House, an intense effort is on the way to retaining a lot of what Mueller sub presupposes privately. ipollone, has improved its staff to handle this fight and employs 17 new lawyers, including three assistant advisors, a senior official said.
Trump’s law and Cipollone believe that much of the Information in Mueller’s investigation should be protected by executive privileges. The Trump lawyers see a heavily edited version of the report becoming public.
For a year, the Trump lawyers and the Mueller team have held discussions about a possible interview with Trump, even though the president has been advised not to speak. His attorneys have told the Special Council that they do not agree on a personal interview, said President’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani until Wednesday at CNN.
But the president agreed to respond to a limited set of written questions regarding issues that occurred before 2016 elections. These replies were submitted before Thanksgiving.
While Mueller stated that there were some follow-up questions, Trump’s lawyers resisted and demanded to know which areas would need further questions, Giuliani told CNN.
Another source familiar with the discussion said the Special Adviser has been told that the President will not answer any more questions.
The Special Council’s office has not responded and it has not been discussed between the two sides then before Christmas, Sade Giuliani.
Although the investigation continues, the Mueller team has already begun to write parts of the report describing the findings, sources familiar with the issue.
A person who knows Mueller and will soon resign Deputy Advocate General Rod Rosenstein said the expectation is that it will be an extremely detailed written analysis and completed after the investigation work is completed. This person said that both Mueller and Rosenstein advocate a written work product, leading to the belief that it will be a thorough report.
But the final product will not fall on Rosenstein’s desk. If confirmed, Bill Barr, the president’s lawyer general, will oversee the investigation and finally decide what happens to the report.
The Ministry of Justice’s regulations for the special council request that Mueller “give the law board a confidential report explaining the prosecutions or refusal decisions made by the specialist adviser” when his work is completed.
The Special Council’s report is expected to answer a number of questions that follow Rosenstein’s orders to appoint him, including if someone in the Trump campaign illegally coordinated with Russians who disrupted the 2016 election.
But, by interviews and actions, investigators have tried to decide whether Trump prevented justice; if Trump knew in advance about the Trump Tower meeting with the Russians in June 2016; about promotional contacts seeking stolen democratic party emails; if foreign money came illegally in the election and what gave rise to the Republican party to change its platform in 2016 on Russian intervention in Ukraine.
The regulations do not require Mueller to share his results with the public.
If Mueller and the Justice Department do not publish the report – and if the White House wants to keep it to a large extent secret – Congress could issue a complaint to force its release.
Democrats, now controlling the House of Representatives, have said they will fight to make the report public.
California Rep. Adam Schiff, the top democrat at the House Intelligence Committee, recently told CNN that he is prepared to “do everything possible so that the public has the benefit of as much information as possible”.
“There may now be parts of the report that need to be edited because they involved classified information or they involve grand jury material” Schiff said on CNN’s “S Union of Jake Tapper” just before Christmas. “At the end of the day, this case is just too important to keep from the American people what it really is about.”
One of the probable points between Trump and Congress opponents is likely to concentrate on whether the president hindered justice with any of his actions during the investigation.
Trump’s law refused to respond to obstructive issues. They have argued that this part of the probe goes to the heart of the president’s constitutional responsibility. It can make some efforts by the Democrats to focus on that issue more disputed. Trump’s lawyers have also tried to resist answering questions about the transition period – the time between the election and the inauguration – and claim that it is part of the upcoming administration and should also be covered by executive privilege.
But Schiff said that the administration has already made a precedent with its cooperation with Republicans in Congress examining Trump’s 2016 opponent Hillary Clinton.
“Over the past two years, I have warned the Ministry of Justice, having turned over tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of pages of investigative files in the Clinton e-mail inquiry, that whatever they should put, they would have to live,” says Schiff .
CNN’s Dana Bash contributed to this report.