A line is formed outside a polling place on the election day in Atlanta on Tuesday. More than 47 percent…
David Goldman / AP
World Cup voting on Tuesday was massive: More than 47 percent of the voting population voted in the middle of the elections on Tuesday. It is according to early estimates from the US election project.
“Almost half of the possible voters actually voted” maybe not sounds impressive. But for an American mid-term, it’s a giant figure. Compare it with only 36.7 percent in 2014 and 41 percent in 2010.
This is the highest rise for a half-period since 1966, when 49 percent of the population appeared vote.
Everyone said that more than 110 million Americans cast a vote for their Congress Representative on Tuesday’s middle elections, according to a Wednesday’s election from the election.
Household Rewards, calculated by The New York Times show that more Democrats voted than Republicans – as expected, given the democratic upheaval of Trump administration. But the total increase in dividends compared to 2014 was true for both parties.
For weeks there were indications of a historical surplus. Early voting was up … in some places. In Texas, more people voted early in this election than voted – in total – 2014.
As additional evidence, polls suggested more people were planning to vote more recently.
All signs pointed to massive voters participation, and on Tuesday the American audience delivered.
Some regions saw particularly robust driving, driven by competition and district games.
According to estimates from the electoral project, more than 60 percent of elected voters in Kansas and Minnesota exhibited. In Kansas, Republican Kris Kobach lost a close contest for the governor. In Minnesota, two senate seats, the governor’s mansion and were several competitive homes.
Do not see the graphics above? Click here.
And Nate Cohn, of Times says some individual districts saw awards at or above 2016 levels – beat a presidential election year.
Everywhere, people were clearly more interested and more enthusiastic about this choice than most midterms.
For Democrats, on the way to the vote on Tuesday, was framed as a resistance to Trump, both symbolically and materially: by taking control of the Chamber, Democrats will now be able to execute a management monitoring measure that was previously impossible.
In the meantime, after careful cry of a “red wave”, the president tried a blink of gatherings and told his republican base to vote as if his name was on the vote.
Then there is the Taylor Swift effect. Seriously. Mega pop star with a massive follow-in Tennessee policy, which is unusual for her. She approved the Democrats and urged her fans to appear in the polls, and her call was followed quickly by an increase in voter registrations. (Her chosen senate candidate lost, but hello, we are speaking here.)
The sharp increase in purchases was worrying about the voter oppression.
Many more voters were cleared from registration rolls between 2014 and 2016 than in previous years. It has raised concerns that people lose voting rights, although striking names from registration rollers are also part of the standard process for states.
At the same time, several states have gone through laws that make it harder to vote. Some of these laws have been terminated while others are in place. And many Republican leaders and officials have made a powerful alarm over fraud fraud, which is extremely rare. Civil-law groups say that such crusades constitute a voice violation.
High voter cloaking does not mean that voter oppression efforts were non-existent or ineffective. Myrna Perez, deputy director of the Brennan Center Democracy Program, told Politifact that the high electoral participation could generally mask suppressed division in some populations, such as people without ID.
In some cases, repression efforts can even be recovered. Think of a North Dakota that requires voter ID to list physical street addresses, which many Indians living on reservations do not have. When the law came into force just a few weeks before the election, tribes were still shrinking to print new IDs.
Jamie Azure, tribal chairman of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, believes that the law is designed to suppress native voting. But he told the NPR, tribes over the state united to “figure out a way to go over the obstacles put before us,” he said. “And this common move goes on with the tribes? It will jump up our percentages, with the Indian voice.”
The Center for Public Integrity reports that immigrants’ voting took place in North Dakota. A tribal region more than doubled the number of voters compared to 2014.